Discuz! Board

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 3|回復: 0

Which is more important, the number or the quality of backlinks from other

[複製鏈接]

1

主題

1

帖子

5

積分

新手上路

Rank: 1

積分
5
發表於 11:33:29 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
Actually, the number of backlinks is not that important. It is true that about 4 or 5 years ago it was said that ``the more links you collect, the better'', but now it is said that ``quality is more important than quantity.'' "Good quality" refers to how well the link source and link destination match. For example, if the source of the link is about ``diet'' but the destination is about ``web marketing,'' it is obvious that the effect of acquiring links will be weak. However, if you have been running a site for a long time, there is a good chance that you will receive links from completely unrelated sites. In that case, it is important to think about the background of why you received such a link, rather than immediately judging it as a bad link.



Quality of backlinks is better than quantity Understanding the Oman Phone Number Data background will help you understand the users who visit your site, and you can use it to create content that will receive high-quality links. Is it better to have an older domain? ! It's not directly related. However, I think there is a correlation between an older domain and a site that has been in operation for a long time, meaning that it has been disseminated a lot of content and received high ratings. Google tends to evaluate sites that have a lot of content and that publish regularly, so if a domain is old, then it is likely to rank higher if it publishes a lot of content and regularly. It may be true that there are many site owners who are concerned about this.




A certain amount is necessary, but when it comes to quality, the age of the domain often does not equal the quality. Conversely, even if your site is newly started, it is quite possible to get it evaluated by Google by writing good content, so don't get too caught up in the age of the domain and focus on creating content. Let's go. Is it better to have a tree-like directory structure and a shallow hierarchy? ? Crawlers, which are programs used to understand the content of a site's pages, tend to understand the content of a site starting from the top page. tree structure Pages with a shallow directory hierarchy often have categories, etc., and tend to collect many internal links, so crawlers check the page more frequently.


回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|自動贊助|

GMT+8, 23:50 , Processed in 0.691640 second(s), 19 queries .

抗攻擊 by GameHost X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
一粒米 | 中興米 | 論壇美工 | 設計 抗ddos | 天堂私服 | ddos | ddos | 防ddos | 防禦ddos | 防ddos主機 | 天堂美工 | 設計 防ddos主機 | 抗ddos主機 | 抗ddos | 抗ddos主機 | 抗攻擊論壇 | 天堂自動贊助 | 免費論壇 | 天堂私服 | 天堂123 | 台南清潔 | 天堂 | 天堂私服 | 免費論壇申請 | 抗ddos | 虛擬主機 | 實體主機 | vps | 網域註冊 | 抗攻擊遊戲主機 | ddos |